Birmingham Fencing Club - Birmingham, AL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MADISON Ethan S. | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
2 | PATEL Kushal | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
3 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
3 | ALLEY Everett T | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
5 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
6 | BROWN Hannah | - | 7% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 1% |
7 | KERTESZ Gabriel E. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 1% |
8 | SOPER Adam | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 29% | 2% |
9 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
10 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 35% | 2% |
11 | CORDOVA Colin | 4% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - |
12 | ARMISTEAD Jack Riley | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
13 | RESTER Christopher | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
14 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
15 | SCHUYLER Benjamin | 24% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
16 | WEBB Jacob T. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | - |
17 | MACALUSO Matthew | 8% | 53% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | CALINSKY Edward | 2% | 26% | 44% | 24% | 4% | - |
19 | RAY William | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
20 | WONG Garrick G. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
21 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% |
22 | LIU Oscar | 3% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - |
23 | MOORE Gabriel | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
23 | BROWN Matt | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 26% | 2% |
25 | ORLANDO Dante | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | ALLEY Mary Ellis | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
27 | MASRI Rania | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
28 | BELCHER Marleigh | 4% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 4% | - |
29 | BASKIN Julia | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
30 | WILEY Morgan | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.