UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DONG Angela | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 2 | WANG CAROL | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 45% | 18% |
| 3 | TAN Dorathy | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 3 | YU Eliza | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 5 | DONG Iris | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | MORSE Katherine | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | WANG DINA C. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 8 | LIN Kenzie | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 10 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 11 | PAN Yiran | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | SONG Erin | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | AADHI Hansika | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 15 | LEVY Gabrielle | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | JIANG Chloe | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 17 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 18 | DESERANNO Seren | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 19 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | BOIKE Lucille | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | MALONE Ella | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | SWOPE Farren | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 23 | KHAN Leena | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | GE Lena Lan | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | KNAPP Isabella | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | MCDANIEL Laila | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 28 | BEYER Johanna | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | STONE Sydney | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | ADLER Zoe | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | MARTIN Sloan | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 33 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEIBERMAN Naomi | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | HUFFMAN Yunia | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | HUANG Natalie | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | NAFSOU Ava | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 38 | RIVERA Leahy | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BROWNING Ruby | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | LINQUIST Jane | 3% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | OWENS Genevieve | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.