UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | JIANG Chloe | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
2 | DONG Iris | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
3 | CULLIVAN Sienna | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
3 | PUTHOFF Olivia | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
5 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
6 | WANG DINA C. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | BOIKE Lucille | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
8 | HUANG Natalie | V D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
9 | RIVERA Leahy | V V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
10 | KNAPP Isabella | V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
11 | ZHANG Priscilla | V V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
12 | FRASER Morgan | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
13 | HUFFMAN Yunia | V D V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
14 | HOROWITZ Shuli | V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
15 | HU Sophie | V D V V D | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
16 | ESMONDE-WHITE Daphne | D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
17 | KOU Elisha | D V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
18 | SAMALA Reese | D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
19 | QIN Selina | D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
20 | WEBB London | V D V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
21 | FORT Eliana | V V D V D D | D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
22 | IANNI Isabel | V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
23 | LYNCH Kathryn | D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
24 | MARTIN Sloan | D D D V V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
25 | CHAN Hailey | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
26 | MA Sophia | D D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
27 | PARANJAPE Ojasvi | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
28 | XU Selina (Tai Ran) | V D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
29 | ZHOU Jolena | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
30 | OWENS Genevieve | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
31 | ZHANG Selina | D D V D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
32 | KIM Gia | V D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
33 | FEDOROFF Elizabeth | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
34 | LEIBERMAN Talia | D D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
35 | RICHARDSON Meredith | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
36 | FANG Elizabeth | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
37 | LIN Athena | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
38 | KIRK Danyla | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.