Tulsa Fencing Club - Tulsa, OK, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DANIELS Anthony | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 2 | KERNYANSKY Steven G. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% |
| 3 | STANTON Richard | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 3 | ARRINGTON Luke | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 3% |
| 5 | ROSENBERG India | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 6 | REYNOLDS Elly | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | KOKKER Thomas | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 9 | HULSON Owen | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | COX James | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 11 | MALISZEWSKI Charlie | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 12 | GIOCOLO David | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 13 | CHRISTIANSEN Joey | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 14 | MURPHY Jonathan | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.