SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 2 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 14% |
| 3 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
| 3 | FENG Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
| 5 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 32% |
| 6 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 7 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 8 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 9 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 10 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 24% |
| 11 | LINDEMANN Marc | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 12 | GAO Payton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 13 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | XIE Buster | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 15 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 16 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 10% |
| 17 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 18 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 20 | LIM Charles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 21 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 4% |
| 24 | WOODCOCK Henry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 27 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 28 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 29 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | GAO Andrew | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TJON Calum | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 34 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 35 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 36 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | GROSPERRIN Eugene | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 39 | COSSROW Alex | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | DHANOA Kian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | BHAN Amar | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | MENDEZ Ren | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 45 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 46 | SORSAIA John | 100% | 97% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | DA SILVA Jamie | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | VO Aidan | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | BONTHA Aadit | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | KRECKE Gareth | 100% | 96% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Liam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 52 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | ALEXANDER Christopher | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 53 | OEHLER Mac | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | EGE Nathan | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BUNDUS Luca | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.