SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% |
2 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
3 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
5 | YURKOVA Mariia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% |
6 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% | 6% |
7 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | |
8 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 1% |
9 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
10 | HAO Danica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | 3% | |
11 | FENG Grace | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% |
12 | WANG Amabel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | - |
13 | CHO Emily (Euran) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
14 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
15 | SHIM Grace J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 8% |
16 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
17 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 3% |
18 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | ||
19 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | ||
20 | BASILE Gianna | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
20 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 3% |
22 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | 100% | 100% | 90% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - |
23 | SHENG Katherine | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - |
24 | WANG Yudi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - |
25 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 6% |
26 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
27 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% | 2% | |
28 | BABIAC Julia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
30 | LI Han (Helina) | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 2% | ||
30 | GREEN Marisa | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 3% | ||
32 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 6% |
33 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | 100% | 99% | 81% | 36% | 6% | - | - |
34 | DONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - |
35 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - |
36 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | 4% |
37 | LI Katerina | 100% | 97% | 73% | 28% | 4% | - | |
38 | WANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | - |
39 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
40 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
41 | FENG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
42 | LAWRENCE Nia | 100% | 84% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
43 | BADLANI Diya | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
44 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - |
45 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
46 | CULLEN Alyssa | 100% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
47 | CHUNG Chloe | 100% | 95% | 55% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
48 | SUN Isabella | 100% | 80% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
49 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 100% | 79% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
50 | COMO Gabriella | 100% | 70% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
51 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
52 | CHENG Isa | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | ||
53 | ANRIG Sydney | 100% | 43% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
54 | CHOI Erin | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | |
55 | WANG Nicky | 100% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
56 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 100% | 44% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
56 | LAZAR Carolina | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
56 | BELISTRI Isabella | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
59 | BERG Samara | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.