Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ROBERTS Sam | V V V V V V V | V V V V | 6.3 | 7 | +0.7 |
| 2 | HJERPE Wade H. | V V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.9 | 7 | +1.1 |
| 3 | HWANG Gabriela M. | V D V D V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 3 | BURR Tanner B. | V V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 5 | LUHMAN Gabriel | V V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 6 | BECKER Dylan J. | V V V V D D D | V D | 5.9 | 4 | -1.9 |
| 7 | WILSON Eva | D V D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 8 | TSAI Michael | D D D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | SILVA Joaquin | V D D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 10 | WRIGHT Lloyd G. | D V V D V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 11 | HICHA Paul R. | D V V V D D D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 12 | PARK James | D D D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 13 | CHAN Elliott | D D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 14 | LABRECQUE Savannah | V D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 15 | COPELAND Jackson | D D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 16 | RAISER George | D D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.