Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FOWLER James A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | KRAVETZ Benjamin (Ben) D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | POPPRE Michael N. | D V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 3 | PACK Tanner D. | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 5 | GREGER Jack | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | SANKEY Luka | V D D V V V | V V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 7 | LAURSEN Logan | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | LOPRESTI Austin | V D V V D | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 9 | KING Charles M. | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 10 | NG Alexander M. | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | CELJO Benjamin | V V V V V D | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 12 | BOYERS Morgan | V V V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | WALLIS Wyatt | V D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 14 | PUTTAMRAJU Nikhil | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | SATISHKUMAR Pranav | D V V V D D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 16 | SAUCEDO Grecia | D V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | FISHER David | V V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 18 | LIPPMAN Elzy | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 19 | COLLIS Tristan M. | D V D V D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 20 | IRVING David | D V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | SYPES Michael A. | V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 22 | CUEVAS Tom | D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 23 | FESTIN Michael G. | V D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 24 | SANKEY Levi | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | HERRON Jonathan | D V D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 26 | YAO Wenyang | D D V D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | BARNEY Lindsey | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 28 | CHERNEK Stephen L. | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 29 | PEDERSEN Haakon | D D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | ZHANG Aixin | V D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 31 | GROZEN Joshua | D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 32 | MARIKOS Christina | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | CONWAY Collin | V D D D D D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 | |
| 34 | FELDMAN Louis | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.