Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
| 2 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 3 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% |
| 5 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% |
| 6 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 7 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
| 8 | DONG Angel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 9 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% |
| 10 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 11 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 12 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 4% |
| 13 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 14 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% |
| 15 | BERMAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 16 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 17 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 18 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 19 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 20 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | |
| 21 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 22 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | 8% |
| 23 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 24 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 16% | |
| 25 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | WU Yuwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 27 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | 3% |
| 28 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 29 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 30 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 5% | |
| 31 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% |
| 32 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 92% | 58% | 21% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 34 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 36% | 5% |
| 35 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% | 4% |
| 36 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 37 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 40 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 41 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 44 | BAINS Nandini | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 45 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 46 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 96% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LI Alexis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 50 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 52 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | |
| 53 | AKULA Roszlynn | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 55 | MAK Kaitlin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | HUANG Doris | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 58 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 59 | LEIGH Adalene | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 62 | HARRISON Allie | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | CHANG Elle | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 64 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 65 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 66 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SHEN Emily | 100% | 80% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 68 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 68 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | YAN Lena | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 71 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 73 | LOCONTO Sophia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 74 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | FIGELMAN Maya | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | XU Elaine | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | PALEY Alisa | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 78 | BARNES Sarah | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 79 | YOON Sela | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 81 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | GUHA Surabhi | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | KWON Ava | 100% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | REKHTMAN Alice | 100% | 76% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
| 85 | LEE Kaelyn | 100% | 88% | 47% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 85 | GETZONI Mary | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | RIFKIN Lielle | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 88 | ROBERTSON Szilvia | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.