Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 2 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 17% |
| 3 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 3 | FENG Ge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% |
| 5 | LI Fei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
| 6 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 6% |
| 7 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 54% |
| 8 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 9 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% |
| 10 | LEE Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 3% |
| 11 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% |
| 12 | REKEDA Anna | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 13 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 14 | AZMEH Nour | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% |
| 15 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | MONOVA Lilyana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
| 18 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% |
| 19 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | 1% |
| 20 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 22 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% |
| 24 | GANSER Nicole | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 25 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
| 26 | BI Michelle | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | 4% |
| 28 | FENG Iris | 100% | 97% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | YANG Charlotte | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | CHEN Alicia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 31 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 32 | YU Eva | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Selina | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% |
| 35 | PARSONS Mischa | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 36 | WANG Sophie Y. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | GAVILANES Madyson | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | SEREGIN Katya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | FANG Kayla | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | TRAN Katherine | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHANG Chloe | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | PAN Angela | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 44 | HOAGLAND Sally | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | PARSONS Leada | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HOM Justina | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | MILLER Cassandra | 100% | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 49 | DAGLI Saira Veronica | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | DENG Joy | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LIU Ilana | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LI Yixin Catherine | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | LIN Cynthia | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | IMRAN Jannat | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | WROBEL Julia | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.