Fence St. Louis - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | RICH Jamieson | 41% | 50% | 9% | - | ||
| 2 | SIERRA Gregory | 21% | 46% | 29% | 4% | ||
| 3 | DEATON Lily | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 5 | HODES Greg | - | 2% | 25% | 73% | ||
| 6 | HODES James | - | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | RANGE Easton | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 8 | HOLMES Daire Ali | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 9 | BOHUS Emma | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 12 | MURPHY Arthur | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | INSKIP Charlie | 5% | 46% | 45% | 3% | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.