JMU University Rec Center - Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WOODLEY Colin | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 2 | PETERS Nathan M. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 3 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% |
| 5 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 72% |
| 6 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 47% | 11% |
| 7 | DIMMETT David C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 8 | WHITE Myles | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 16% | 1% |
| 9 | ANDERSON Derek M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 33% | 6% |
| 10 | BAGHA Armin | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% | |
| 11 | ZALEWSKI David | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 12 | CARTER Austin L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 50% | 9% |
| 13 | LAM Bill | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 13 | MONTESI Eric | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | WATSON Raymond | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | ZOOK Evan D. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 17 | KIM Minjun | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | JHA Ritika | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 19 | BARTLETT Lauren | 2% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | COVITZ Ashley A. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | PANE Patrick | 1% | 12% | 43% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | BLANKENSHIP Benjamin T. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 22 | SCHAPIRO Jacob | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 5% |
| 24 | DOYLE Jacob | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 25 | WOODLEY George | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | FEAGIN Patrick | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | KELLOFF Michael | 14% | 52% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | BADLANI Neel | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | SOUTHWORTH Connor | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | WALLACE George | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | VENHAM Adam | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | TANG Justin | 1% | 9% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | SARGEANT Jackson | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | SINGH Jawand | - | < 1% | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 35 | ASBY Will | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | LUNDEN Espen | 20% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | BARBER Christopher | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 38 | KANE Rachel | 15% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | WALKER Joseph | 35% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | KHATTAK Sara | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | THOMPSON Conner | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.