Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 89% |
2 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
3 | HEPLER Sarah | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 11% |
3 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
5 | CHA Eugenie | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
6 | LIANG Jingjing | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | |
7 | LIN Ashley | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
8 | CHANG Heidi | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
9 | HANSEN Kira | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
10 | TANG RUIRUI | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
11 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
12 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
12 | DAYAL Saahira | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
14 | HOFMAN Haejung | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
15 | KIM Jayna | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
16 | WANG Victoria | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | - |
17 | WANG Zoe | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
18 | CHIEM Karen | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
19 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
20 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
21 | RICH Caroline B. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% |
22 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
23 | MOLLINIER Angel | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
24 | SALISTRA Emilia | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
25 | JAMES Ashley | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | GUAN Isabella | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - |
27 | LAI Amanda | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
28 | BHATT Anisha | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
29 | DUONG Zoey | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 35% | 12% | - |
30 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
31 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | ENRILE Erica | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | POON Desiree | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
34 | DALEY Keira | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
35 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | COHEN Shaina | 2% | 61% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
37 | OSTRIKOFF Michelle | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | ZHU Riley | 16% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
39 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
40 | XU Celina | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
41 | CHUNG Penelope | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
42 | YIN Gabriela | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | MEWES Katie M. | 20% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
44 | LEE Samantha X. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% | - |
45 | SMITH Marissa | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
46 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.