Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 2 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 3 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
| 3 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | |
| 5 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 6 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | 4% |
| 6 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 8 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 9 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 10 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 11 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% | |
| 12 | KOHLBERGER Noelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 5% |
| 13 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 14 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | KWON Ava | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 16 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 23% | |
| 18 | BAIREDDY Maya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 19 | FREEMAN Armine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | MANI Francesca B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
| 21 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | |
| 22 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 13% | |
| 23 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
| 24 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
| 25 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 26 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 26 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 28 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 98% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
| 30 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 97% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHANG Elle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 34 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | PROCTOR Sienna | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | LOCONTO Sophia | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | LEE Kaelyn | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 42 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 43 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 44 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | CUTLER Juliet | 100% | 86% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
| 46 | HO Sophia | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | GUHA Surabhi | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | ROBERTSON Szilvia | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | LIM Alexa J. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.