Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOO Sara | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 2 | GE Deanna | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 3 | CHAN Jolene | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 3 | BYK Karalina | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 5 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 6 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 7 | ENRIQUEZ Bianca Perla | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 8 | ZHU Alivia | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 9 | LIANG Jasmine | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | ZHU Audrey | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 11 | GOMEZ Amelia | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 12 | VO Evelyn | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 13 | ZHENG Annalyn | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 14 | LUO lucy | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 14 | XING Melly | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | CHAN Jaclyn | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MILLER Anna | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 18 | JU Victoria | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 19 | CHIN Harper | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 20 | ELNAGGAR lea | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LEE Annabel | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | CHEN qinying | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 23 | PAEK Ellie | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | LI YE Ruhan | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | WU Caroline | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | GRINKIV Solomia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | ALPEROVICH Madeline | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.