Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TENG EMMA | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% |
2 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 31% |
3 | VINOKUR Anita | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
3 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
5 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
6 | LEOU Korina | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
7 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
8 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
9 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
10 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
11 | GONG Joy | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
12 | CHIANG Melissa | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
13 | KWON Ava | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
14 | FOSS Persephone | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
15 | AKULA Roszlynn | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
16 | CHOI Charlotte | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
17 | LEE Kaitlin | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | < 1% |
18 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
19 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
20 | NIU Jessica | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 24% | 4% |
21 | STADNIK Emilia | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
22 | BUSH Bethany | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% |
23 | GUHA Surabhi | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | ZONG Eliane | 2% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
25 | MACKAY Katherine | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
26 | KIM Grace | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
27 | NANDA Maanika | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
28 | LAFFY Lily | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - |
29 | CHANG Elle | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
30 | CHAN Madeleine V. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
31 | HAGN Luna | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
32 | WONG Charlene | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
33 | LEE Hannah | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
34 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
35 | ENG Madeleine | 6% | 37% | 39% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
36 | CUTLER Juliet | 3% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | FONG Abigail | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
38 | DESAUTELS Alexandra | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
39 | YOUNG Sienna | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
40 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | BORDUCCI Madeleine | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
42 | CHI Alicia | 52% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | KIM Eunjae | 2% | 19% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | KAKAR Sahana | 1% | 9% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
45 | STEDMAN Sienna | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
46 | DIBADJ Ava | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
47 | SMITH Genevieve | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
48 | CHURCH Madeline | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.