Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
2 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
3 | HO Kaden M. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
3 | SHTEYN Mark | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
5 | CHENG Kyle | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
6 | NOBLE Colin | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% | |
7 | ZHENG Edward L. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | |
8 | DENG Andrew | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
9 | ZENG Noah | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
10 | BREKHMAN Eric | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
11 | MARGULIES William | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
12 | CHENG Cody | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
13 | GILSON Lucas B. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
14 | OH Triton | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
15 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
16 | PANDEY Neil | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 3% | |
17 | PIWOWAR Alex | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
18 | SHI Erick | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | SANDERS Samuel B. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
20 | OVERDECK Andrew | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | KOVACH Jonah F. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
22 | CHANG Yufeng | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
23 | HUANG Maxwell H. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
24 | WAXLER Seth B. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
25 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
26 | RUIGOMEZ Eduardo | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | MALONE Gregory D. | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 17% | |
28 | SMINK Oliver | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
29 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
30 | VOSS Jeffer | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
31 | ZHENG Joshua | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
32 | MORALES Jonathan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
33 | TONG Luke | 10% | 28% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | REN James | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | MOULTON Ian | 23% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
36 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
37 | LEONARD Charles | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
38 | WANG Robert | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
39 | WANG Oscar | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
40 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
41 | LAU Justin Y. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
42 | LIN Hadrian | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
43 | POSY Daniel | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | CHUANG Tristan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
45 | TANG Charles | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
46 | GONG Jerry | 16% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.