SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
2 | SLASTIN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
3 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
3 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
5 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 70% |
6 | MATTOO Deven | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
7 | NG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 12% | |
8 | KANG Evan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
9 | KIM ELIJAH | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
10 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
11 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
12 | VINCI Flavio | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 25% |
13 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | |
14 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% | |
15 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
16 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
17 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
18 | BONDARENCO Vlad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 5% |
19 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
19 | FELDMAN Drew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 13% |
21 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
22 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
23 | GLOZMAN Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
24 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 5% | - |
25 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
26 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
27 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
28 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 14% |
29 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
30 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 29% |
31 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
32 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | - |
33 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
34 | LEE Anderson | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
35 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
36 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
37 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% |
38 | SEN Christian | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | KIM Andrew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
40 | MERCHANT Milan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
41 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
42 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 12% | |
43 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
44 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
45 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
46 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
47 | POWER Alex | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
48 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
49 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
50 | VAROQUA Nalby | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
51 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | 4% | |
52 | KUMAR Arjun | 100% | 97% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | |
53 | ZHU Shao | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
54 | AHLMAN Jason | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
55 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
56 | POLESHUCK KINEL Gil | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
58 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
59 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
61 | HO Jacob | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
62 | ZHOU Grant | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
63 | BHATIA Ekam | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
64 | VILEMAITIS Tadas | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
65 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
66 | ALMEDA Stanislav | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
67 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
68 | KOGAN Nikita | 100% | 99% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
69 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
70 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
71 | GRASSO Sebastiano | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
72 | HE Bowen | 100% | 99% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
73 | NG Timothy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
74 | SIMMONS John M. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
75 | WEI William | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
76 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
76 | IVRON Yonatan | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
78 | YOSHEA Henry | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
79 | LASKOW Oliver | 100% | 88% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
80 | HUSTON Theodore | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
81 | LONDELL Jett | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
82 | SIMATOS Luka D. | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
83 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
84 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
85 | SCHUCHMAN Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
86 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
87 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | - |
88 | RILEY "Jack" | 100% | 75% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
89 | EMIR Koray | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
90 | MUNJULURI ruhaan | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | LIGUORI Michael | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
91 | MAMKIN Nathan | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
93 | JACQUES Hugo | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
94 | ROSADO Sebastian | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
95 | ARORA Pranav | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.