The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Jersey Clash RYC/RJCC& Y8

Y-14 Men's Saber

Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 1:00 PM

SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BONETTI Brayden - - - 3% 15% 40% 42%
2 SADHU Neiyam - 1% 9% 27% 41% 22%
3 SARWAHI Viraat - 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 3%
3 BALE ATMAN - 1% 9% 29% 41% 19%
5 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - - 1% 7% 24% 42% 27%
6 CIEMINS Henry - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8%
7 YOSHEA Henry - 7% 30% 39% 20% 3%
8 SHINCHUK Jacob 6% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1% -
9 YOOK Isaac - - 1% 6% 23% 41% 29%
10 ZHAO Royce - - 1% 7% 23% 41% 28%
11 BELAND Riley James "RJ" - 2% 11% 30% 36% 19% 3%
12 KIARA Kinoti - 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
13 MCDONALD Finn - 2% 16% 39% 34% 9%
14 DEELY Hartigan - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
15 TSAO Alister 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1%
16 LIEBOWITZ Carson 1% 9% 25% 34% 23% 7% 1%
17 TRZEPLA Max 2% 13% 27% 31% 19% 6% 1%
18 LIN Brendan - - 2% 12% 32% 39% 15%
19 CHENG Sawyer - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
20 CHA James - 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 8%
21 LIU ERIC 1% 5% 17% 30% 29% 15% 3%
22 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - - 1% 9% 26% 40% 24%
23 KOZLOV Lucas - 3% 16% 35% 34% 13%
24 DAI Zihou - 2% 12% 32% 39% 16%
25 AVERY Marcus 5% 19% 31% 28% 13% 4% -
26 PORTER Dupree - 2% 12% 29% 34% 18% 3%
27 KOGAN Yelisey L. - 3% 17% 36% 33% 11%
28 MORGAN Abrahm H. - 1% 6% 24% 43% 26%
29 FADEL Alexander - - 4% 20% 43% 33%
30 DE SIENA Salvatore - 1% 10% 30% 40% 19%
31 NERSESIAN-LOPEZ Nicholas - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 8%
32 KENNEDY Tomás 1% 7% 23% 34% 26% 9% 1%
33 WEI William 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 10% 1%
34 AGARWAAL Yohan - - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
35 TUNIK Joshuah 1% 6% 23% 36% 25% 8% 1%
36 STEWART Samuel 8% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
37 LUCAS William 1% 6% 25% 39% 25% 5%
38 LIU Ryan - 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
39 KETT Richard 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
40 LAU Kyrus 7% 31% 38% 20% 4% -
41 SHAPIRO Simon 1% 10% 30% 36% 20% 4%
42 MARTINSON Torm 1% 6% 20% 33% 27% 11% 2%
43 SUN Stephen 3% 17% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
44 NIEJADLIK Samuel 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 8% 1%
45 TONG Kyle - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
46 BLUM Peter PJ 1% 11% 31% 35% 17% 3% -
47 LOSQUADRO Joseph 27% 40% 24% 7% 1% - -
47 MATTOO Dhruv 1% 9% 27% 35% 21% 6% 1%
49 MIAO Heqi - 3% 14% 30% 33% 17% 3%
50 HU Jayden - 1% 8% 26% 37% 23% 5%
51 HAUSLER Jayden 43% 39% 14% 3% - - -
52 VISH Manyu 34% 42% 19% 4% - -
53 MERMEGAS Alexander - 4% 22% 41% 27% 6%
54 OREN Daniel 7% 27% 38% 23% 6% 1%
55 LORENZ Evan 1% 6% 18% 30% 28% 14% 3%
56 JI Johnson 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
57 GERTSBERG Eli 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 5% 1%
58 CHOPRA Siddharth - 2% 13% 32% 36% 16% 2%
59 CHAN Ewan 21% 40% 29% 9% 1% -
60 IVRON Daniel 35% 48% 15% 2% - -
61 SONG Aidan 2% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2%
62 MUNOZ Jonas 73% 24% 3% - - -
63 BENNETT Lachlan 3% 13% 28% 31% 19% 6% 1%
64 NAYAGAM Nishant 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
65 WU Vincent 1% 6% 18% 30% 28% 14% 3%
66 KU Alexander 18% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
67 ZWAKA Jonas - 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 8%
68 KUMAR Avinash 2% 14% 31% 32% 17% 4% -
69 PAI Ayan 17% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
70 FREILICH Harrison 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
71 SO Morgan 1% 8% 25% 37% 24% 5%
72 SHEYNZON Benjamin 17% 40% 31% 10% 2% -
73 GARLAND Nathan 18% 38% 30% 11% 2% -
74 SINGH Sumair 6% 26% 37% 24% 6% 1%
75 SAYAR Luke 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
76 WANG tiger 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
77 O’LOUGHLIN Jacob 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
77 VOHRA Ekam 17% 38% 30% 12% 2% - -
79 ROSENMAN Turner 1% 8% 22% 31% 25% 11% 2%
80 CHEN Vince 38% 42% 17% 3% - - -
81 ROGOFF Arlo 8% 30% 36% 19% 5% 1% -
82 YANG Byron 4% 20% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
83 LEE Korbon 2% 22% 49% 22% 4% -
84 SARBU ERIC 35% 48% 15% 2% - -
85 MALONEY Noah 1% 26% 42% 24% 6% 1% -
86 WANG William 31% 42% 21% 5% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.