LeRoy T. Walker Physical Education and Recreation Complex, NC Central University - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 2 | GUAN Dennis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 16% |
| 3 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 3 | TIAGI George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 16% | |
| 5 | YE Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% |
| 6 | SUN Ziyao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 7 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 8 | MCGUIRE Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 70% | |
| 9 | GONG Gavin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | ||
| 10 | STRUCKER Rocco | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | ||
| 11 | LIN Felix | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | CRAIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | WILKINSON James | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | YE Ivan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 15 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | FRUTH Evan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 17 | KIM Samuel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | ||
| 18 | VALENCIA Jose | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 19 | LIU Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
| 20 | SLEP Solomon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | EYSTER Edison | 100% | 93% | 62% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | SZULIM Lucjan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 23 | PAUL James | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | XU Ivan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 25 | KURILO Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | BREUER Daniel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 27 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 28 | PARCELL Colby | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | SHIM Tristan | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | BAGHERI Bijan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | BIALIK Noah | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BALU Aedan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 34 | BENE Andrew | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | ||
| 35 | KIRCHMAIER Charlie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CHAWLA Abhishek | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | ROORDA Easton | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | ||
| 38 | WANG Tim | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 39 | BENE Paul | 100% | 62% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.