Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 2 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | MAREK SOFIA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
| 5 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 30% |
| 6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 7 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 8 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 9 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 10 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 11 | DAVIS Jordan | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 12 | LIN Angela | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 13 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 14% | |
| 14 | MAGLIATO Julia | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 16 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 17 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 18 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 19 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 21 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | YUN Emma | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 23 | CRUZ Sonia | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | WANG Audrey | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | YAN Ava | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | XU ALINA | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DUBE Naomi | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ZAMAN Rania | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 88% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | FEO ZAKHAROVA Isabella | 100% | 92% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.