Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHRETIEN PAULINE | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | SLACKMAN Valerie | D V V V V D | V V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
3 | ZHANG Maya | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
3 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
5 | ZHANG Tina | V V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
6 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
7 | FALLON Kyle R. | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
8 | LIN Jessica Y. | V V V V V V | V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
9 | LIN Katie Y. | V V D V V V | V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
10 | KULKARNI Diya | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
11 | CHAN Elizabeth | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
12 | PATURU Meghana | V V V V D D | V V | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
13 | CHOI Lyla | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
14 | ASHER Valerie | D D V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
15 | YOON Julia J. | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
16 | HUH Anna | D D V D V | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
17 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
18 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
19 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | V V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
20 | KIM Diane E. | D V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
21 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | D D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
22 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | V V D V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
23 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | D D V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
24 | NI Emma | D V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
25 | LEE Olive | V V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
26 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
27 | GU Sarah | V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
28 | YAO Jillian | D V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
29 | LONG Cindy | D V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
30 | PARTE Isabella B. | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
31 | HILL Phoebe | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
32 | HENRY Asha S. | D D D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
33 | APONTE Monica I. | V D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
34 | LANZMAN Anna B. | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
35 | GORDET Cristina G. | D D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
36 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
37 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | D V D D V V | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
38 | KIM Rachael | D V V V D D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
39 | SAFKO Liubov V. | V V D D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
39 | LUO Ashley | V D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
41 | WICKEN Baylee S. | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
42 | NICOU Nicole | V D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
43 | COBERT Helen G. | D D D V D V | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
44 | LAWSON Marie A. | V V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
45 | WOLF Lisa A. | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
45 | CANNEY Lauren | D D V D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
47 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | V D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
48 | JOHNSON Ryleigh E. | V D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
49 | MOK Chloe R. | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
50 | BRADLEY Katherine | D D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
50 | CORDERO Allison | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
52 | BOWIE Charlotta | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
53 | BYRON Karen J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
54 | ZISCHKE Alexandra A. | D D D D D D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.