Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 6% | 29% | 53% | 12% |
| 2 | HOM Avery | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 3 | YU Sophie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 5 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 6 | HSU Emily | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 7 | PARK Lauren | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 8 | THERON Zoe | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 48% | 19% | |
| 9 | SAH Madeleine | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 10 | ZOU JIAYING | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | < 1% |
| 11 | CHAN Ella | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 12 | NEUMANN Erika | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 13 | ZHAO Olivia | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 15 | HSIAO Ariya | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | LIU Ariana | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 17 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 18 | CHO Karis | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 19 | CHANG Lydia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 20 | ZHANG Elizabeth | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | CHAN Mila | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
| 22 | KIM Audrey | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | LEE Abigail | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 24 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 25 | TAI Taphanie | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | XIA Isabella | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 26 | DVOIRIS Maya | 2% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Yasmin | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | THOTA Akira | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | ARYA Leela | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | OLSHANSKY Dalia | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | KIM Natalie | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | JOESUF Aurielle | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 34 | JENA Aanvi | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 35 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 36 | QIAO Lori-Ann | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 37 | HOFFMAN Isabelle | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | LI Audrey | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 39 | TANG Amelia | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 40 | XU Ella | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 41 | Q Mia | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 42 | HO Chloe | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | IRELAND Moira | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LIU Angelina | 1% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | TEWARI Amaira | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | SHEN Gloria | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | HSU Rachel | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 48 | BENNYHOFF Myla | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 49 | ZHAN Catherine | 1% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | HOM Emma | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 52 | FATTAL Leila | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 52 | TIAN Claire | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | DURBIN Libby | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 55 | YANG Byanca | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | COLIC LANI | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | KACI Malia | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LIU Mia | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHENG Audrey | 14% | 34% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 60 | TU Averie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 61 | FENG Scarlett | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | SARANGAN Ovia | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | JEANSON Sierra | 7% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | VIERTEL Etta | 24% | 52% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 65 | PARK Seojeong | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 66 | LIN Avery | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | LEE Adelaide | - | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | PRAKASH Rhea | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 69 | ERDMAN-SINESIO Sophia | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | KO Adeline | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 71 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 72 | TOYOFUKU Evelyn | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | KIM Phoebe | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 74 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 75 | ANSARI Sara | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | PARK Gian | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.