Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 91% |
2 | LU Samantha R. | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 9% | |
3 | HU Chelsea | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | - |
3 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
5 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
6 | LEE Yedda | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
8 | KIM Angelina | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
9 | ZHU Serene M. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
11 | WITTER Catherine A. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
12 | QIU Emily | 9% | 36% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
13 | CHAWLA Aanya | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
14 | LIU Nicole | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
15 | WU Rebecca | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
16 | YANG Alisa | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
17 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
18 | MISHIMA Audrey | 28% | 48% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
19 | KOKE Kristen | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.