Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PASTORE LIU Vince | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
2 | ANDRES Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
3 | HOLZ Lucas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
3 | LI AYDEN | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
5 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
6 | WONG Lucas | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
7 | ZHAO Royce | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% |
8 | BEVANS Auden | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | < 1% | - |
9 | HO Anson | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 37% | 7% |
10 | YUEN Caleb | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
11 | CAUTHRON Oliver | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
12 | HWANG Hagan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
13 | TANG Morgan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
14 | VO Landon | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
15 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
16 | SEPUCHA Sam | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
17 | KOZLOFF Wyatt | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
18 | BURKE Sam | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | ROBINSON Ezra | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
20 | LI Ryan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
21 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 41% | 11% |
22 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
23 | LUC Cedric | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
24 | SOULES-ONO Makoa | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | XIAO Brayden | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
26 | WONG Hawken | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
27 | LIU Guanyu | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
28 | SU Kingston | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
29 | ALLEN-BRUNS Ryder | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
30 | EZZELL Alexander | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
31 | KANIA Alexander | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
32 | CHEN Cooper | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
33 | ROH Jaden | 2% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | CHANG Timothy | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
35 | CHAVAN Aditya | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
36 | SLOAN Ethan | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | SONG Aidan | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
38 | BRADIC Andreja | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | NAFTALI Ori | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | BRAUN Oscar | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
40 | PARK Emerson | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | MARCISZ Maksym | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.