Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
2 | WONG Garrick G. | - | - | - | - | - | 33% | 66% |
3 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | - | - | - | - | 3% | 97% | |
3 | LEE Jeemin | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
5 | LIM Eunseong | - | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | - | |
6 | PHAN Henry | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% | - |
7 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - | |
8 | CHAKRAVARTY Amrik | 1% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | LIU Runze | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
10 | JOHNSON Soren | 2% | 19% | 43% | 31% | 5% | - | |
11 | KARLEKAR Ved | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | KIM Alison | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
13 | PARK Jubin | 41% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
14 | HOWIE Palmer | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.