BEAVERTON, OR - BEAVERTON, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHANG Brandon | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
2 | DILLREE Spencer S. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
3 | KWOCK Kaiana P. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
3 | SHASHA Zane | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
5 | LUO George F. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
6 | KAKEHI Nicholas B. | - | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
7 | WEI Alex | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
8 | BULL Anderson | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
9 | YUN Jake | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
10 | CABLE Dante | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
11 | YORK Andrew | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
12 | XU Andrew | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
13 | SAMMI Mukund | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
14 | BARRONG Austin D. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
15 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Oliver | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
16 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | - | 2% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
17 | DANYO David | 14% | 67% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
18 | ZHOU Victor | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
19 | YAN Leonard Z. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
20 | MCNALL Connor | 80% | 19% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.