Brentwood High School - Brentwood, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DRYSDALE Lita | - | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 14% |
2 | SCANLAN Claire | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
3 | HASIM Eurietta | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 24% | 4% | < 1% |
3 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
5 | PEI Audrey | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 12% |
6 | POON Desiree | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
7 | SHETTY Nandita | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
8 | STEMPEL Taylor | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
9 | GEYER Victoria M. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
10 | UM KIM Hyun Hee Lorena | 9% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
11 | MOHEBI Neeka | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
12 | SCHAFFER Sophia | 4% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | WRIGHT Taylor | 4% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
14 | MOORADIAN Anya | 1% | 8% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
15 | TSUI Zoe | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
16 | MOORE Christiahn | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
17 | IACCINO Lauren | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
18 | CHENG Liwen | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
19 | RAMIREZ Leah | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
20 | TOLBERT-SCHWARTZ Cayley | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
21 | GORDON Chloe | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
22 | TEDFORD Bridget | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% |
23 | DANKO Siena | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | - |
24 | SUAREZ Grace | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
25 | HARRISON Brynn | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
26 | SHIN Lana | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
27 | KAYE Amy | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
28 | BUCASAS Lia | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
29 | DASHEVSKY Jordan | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
30 | BARDAKOS Katherine | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
31 | AMIR Olivia | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
32 | NICDAO Aurora Jayne | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | KIM Audrey | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
34 | TEGTMEYER Sophia | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
35 | KIM Kaylee | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
36 | VILLALTA Olivia | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
37 | OGLESBY-HALL Quinn | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
38 | FOUSE LAWRENCE Asha | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
39 | HICBAN Janoah Keisha Marin | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
39 | ZHOU Ivy | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
41 | NAGUIT Alexandria | 2% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
41 | MILLINER Cassidy | 1% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.