Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LARSEN Samuel F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 47% |
2 | JOHNSON Ryder | 100% | 100% | 98% | 59% | 16% | 1% | |
3 | TESCHE Askhat D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% |
3 | DU SHUNYU K. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 3% | |
5 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
5 | HUANG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
7 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% | |
8 | DAZO Steven (Steve) P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 29% | 4% | |
9 | BAXTER Daniel J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 18% | |
10 | BARTELS Marc | 100% | 100% | 92% | 43% | 8% | 1% | |
11 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 9% | |
12 | KIM Teo | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 6% | - | - |
13 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 36% | 4% |
14 | HANNON Owen | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
15 | GLATZ Alesia | 100% | 86% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
16 | CLINEFELTER Dennis S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 6% | |
17 | GOWDA Suyog | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
18 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | |
19 | SCHULTZ Nomi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
20 | BIRK Francisco | 100% | 93% | 9% | - | - | - | |
21 | RIDLEY Alan P. | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
22 | ST CLAIR Soren | 100% | 21% | - | - | - | - | |
23 | SHIN Soorim | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
24 | CALKINS Logan | 100% | 69% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
25 | MONKUS Ryder | 100% | 93% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.