Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% |
| 2 | LI Alice | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
| 3 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | LI Savannah | 1% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 7% |
| 6 | ZEE Savannah | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 7 | LI Joy | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% | |
| 8 | CASHMAN Hailey | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 9 | KRAHE Annika | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 10 | WANG Doreen | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 11 | DENG Claire | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
| 13 | SOE Hayleigh | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 14 | HAN Gian | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 15 | HOM Avery | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 16 | HAFEZ Sahar | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | KIM Sydney | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 18 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | ZHOU Joi | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | YU Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 21 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | TELEB Farida | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 23 | KIM Lauren | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 24 | KIM Natalie | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | LEE Zoe | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 26 | PARK Lauren | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 40% | 8% |
| 27 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | JOO Sara | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 29 | HUGHES Olivia | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 30 | ANWEILER Megan | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | MALIK Manha | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 32 | ZHANG Queeny | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | CHEN Aimee | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 34 | HSU Rachel | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHUN Ami | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 36 | DILLON Zoe | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LEE Lauren Jinju | 22% | 45% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | SINGH Evangelina | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | HOM Emma | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | HO Chloe | 35% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | DESAI Zoya | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | IRELAND Moira | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | NEAL Catherine | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 44 | SCHWABAUER Emilia | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 45 | TREVISAN Olivia | 1% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.