Bellevue, WA - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | KONG Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% | |
| 3 | SU Alysa J. | - | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 5 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 6 | PENG Amber L. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 7 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% |
| 8 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 9 | YIN Helen | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | < 1% |
| 10 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 11 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% | |
| 12 | ZHOU Zi Tian (Angela) | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 13 | LEE Bethanie | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
| 14 | DING Abigail | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | SUN Ruoxi | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 16 | SHIH Diane | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 17 | HSIUNG Samantha | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | SEIGEL Norah | - | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 19 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 20 | LI Angela | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | KALE Anika A. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 22 | YEN Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 20% | |
| 23 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | SU Alena J. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | CUI Amy | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 28 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 3% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 5% | |
| 29 | LAMBERT Mahala | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 30 | MALAGUZZI Irene | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 31 | CHEN Ella | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 32 | CHEN Teresa Y.Z. | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LEE Samantha X. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BEAVER Hannah | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 36 | WANG Yuxin | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 3% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | PUGH Jennifer | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 40 | SANDAU Ella | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | GONG Chloe | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | WU Sarah | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 43 | WELBORN Calissa | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 45 | KIM Junnie | 25% | 64% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.