Orange County Convention Center - Orlando, FL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHEN Renee | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | SHENG Chuxi | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | DU Hannah | V V D D D V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
3 | WANG SIQI | D D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
5 | GE Yu Ming | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
6 | PAULUS Sloane E. | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
7 | LI Yuhe | V V V D V D | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
8 | YU Jane | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
9 | SHA Yi Ling | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
10 | DONG Angela | V V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
11 | LEVY Avery | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
12 | WU Renee | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
13 | OH Ceana | V V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
14 | ZHANG Eunice | D D V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
15 | GREEN Marisa | V V V D D D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
16 | ZHANG Ivy | D V V D V D | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
17 | CHOW Annabelle | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | COOPER Piper W. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
19 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
19 | WEBB Ella | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
21 | BIODROWICZ Julia | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
22 | WANG Sabrina | V V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 6 | +3.4 |
23 | KOSTELNY Alexis | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
24 | SHMUKLER Maria | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
25 | SAIFEE Lamya | V V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
26 | LUONG Tiffany C. | V V D V V V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
27 | HAN Crystal | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
28 | WANG CAROL | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
29 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | V D D D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
30 | LAI Sophia | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
31 | QUINN Anna | D D V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
32 | ZHANG Selena | V D D V D | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
33 | ZELDIN Nadia | V V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | FIELD Julianna | V D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
35 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | D V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
36 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | V V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
37 | FENG Audrey | D V V D V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
37 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | V D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | MATOS Lívia | V V D V D V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
40 | HAN Ashley | V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
41 | WANG Celine S. | D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
42 | WEI Angela | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
43 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | V D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
44 | RICHARD Dominique | V V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
45 | TURNER Stephanie E. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
46 | CHENG Isa | D V D D V V | V D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
47 | MARKOVSKY Nina | D V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
48 | NEUMAN Sophie | D V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
49 | NELSON Tanya | V D V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
50 | DOMINGUEZ Erika | V D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | MARTIRE Alessandra | D V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
52 | HOBSON Ava | V V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
53 | LEE emily | D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
54 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | V D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
55 | BEAVER Ava | V D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
56 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | V D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
57 | FELLMAN Sara | V D D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
58 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | D V D D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
59 | SONG Erin | D V V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
60 | RICHARD Clara | D V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
61 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | V D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
62 | PAULUS Isabella | D D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
63 | YIM Rachael | V D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
64 | DEBLAERE Caecie M. | D D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
65 | GADIYARAM Sushama | D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
66 | WANG Yudi | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
67 | MEYER Claudia | D D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
67 | CHOI ERIN | D D V D V D | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
69 | OJEDA Andrea | V D D D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
70 | OWENS Elise | V D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
71 | ISAACSON Mary Beth | D V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
71 | SONG Jenna | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
73 | HWANG Chanel | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
74 | TAYLOR Gabrielle | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
75 | MENDEZ SCHIK Hannah | D D D V D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
76 | BABER Eshaal | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
77 | BROWN Lily | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
78 | SHIN Jaelynn | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
79 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
80 | WANG Sophia | D D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
81 | FRIEND Sophie | D D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
82 | CHANG Janelle | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
83 | LAWRENCE Nia | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
84 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
85 | BEN YAHMED Farah | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
86 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
87 | BALCE Cyril | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
88 | WANG Kelsey | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
89 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.