Bellevue, WA - Bellevue, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 2 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 3 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 37% | |
| 3 | YEN Natalie | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 5 | LEE Bethanie | - | - | 1% | 11% | 47% | 41% | |
| 5 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 7 | LEE Samantha X. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 8 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 1% | 15% | 51% | 33% | |
| 9 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 10 | CHEN Ella | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 11 | LAMBERT Mahala | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 12 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 13 | SU Alena J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 14 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% |
| 15 | SEIGEL Norah | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 16 | WELBORN Calissa | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | KOSLOW Amicie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 18 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 19 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | - | 2% | 21% | 52% | 22% | 3% | |
| 21 | RAO Sonia D. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 22 | CUI Amy | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 23 | HAN Crystal | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | HAN Ashley | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | XUE Ellie | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | BEAVER Hannah | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 27 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 30% | 6% | |
| 28 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | ZHANG Eunice | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 31 | CHEN Chloe I. | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | FAN Lydia | 10% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | - |
| 36 | ZHANG Selena | 14% | 38% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | KIM Rachel | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | HO Kristen | 25% | 51% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | ULZII Sanaa K. | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | SULLIVAN Emma | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 43 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Zoe | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | MAENG Victoria | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.