Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
2 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
3 | HU Allison C. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
3 | LI Victoria J. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
5 | TODD Phoebe | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
6 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
7 | SHI Cathleen | - | - | 6% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
8 | WEI Vivian W. | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
9 | CHANG Emily | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
10 | MA Grace C. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
11 | NI Sharon | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
12 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 56% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - |
13 | LU Amy | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
14 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
15 | RODRIGUEZ Colette O. | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
16 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
17 | BAKER Amelia M. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
18 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 15% | 48% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.