Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
2 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
3 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
3 | YOON Junhyeok | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 7% |
5 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
6 | MOE Annan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
7 | XU Dinghui Ryan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
8 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% | 1% |
9 | YU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | |
10 | REDONDO Tomas D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 2% | |
11 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
12 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 2% | |
13 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
14 | HARWOOD Gray | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | DHOKTE Neev | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
16 | BOWLES Kevin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
17 | KIMURA Ryo | 100% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
18 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
19 | CAO Kellen | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
20 | LEBEDOVYCH Tristin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | |
21 | GUTHRIE Aaron | 100% | 94% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
22 | MILES Greyson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
23 | ROTHMAN Matthew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
24 | TOSCANO Sebastian | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
25 | DANIZ FERNANDO A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
26 | FLYNN Oliver | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.