Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HE Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 3 | SINGH Ravin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 3 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 5 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 6 | BENNETT Pierce | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 7 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
| 8 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 9 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
| 10 | CHA Patrick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 11 | AYOTTE James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 12 | CORDOVA Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 8% |
| 13 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 14 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 15 | ARZT Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 16 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | KIM Julian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 19 | SCHIFFHAUER Bram | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | SZIEDE Kieran | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 22 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 24 | VICK Ethan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 26 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | QU RuiTing | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SHIM Jae | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 29 | KHEGAY Martin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 30 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 31 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 33 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | FONG Henry | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HAGERMAN Mark | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.