Liacouras Center - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BLUM Leah | V D V V V V | V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | OLSEN Natalie | V V V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | CHANG Josephine | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | LU Hailey | V D V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 5 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | ANDRES Katherine | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 7 | NOVICK Mia J. | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 8 | TURNER Zoe Y. | D D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 9 | STONE Hava | V V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 10 | GORMAN Victoria | V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | COLTER Aurora | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 12 | JOHNSON Lauren | V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | MENKE Kavya | V V D V V D V V | V D | 6.2 | 6 | -0.2 |
| 14 | LIU Rachel | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | VENTURA Eva | D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 16 | CRAINE Alexandra | D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 17 | GORMLEY Arwen | V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | DANK Dina | D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 19 | PINCUS Emma | V V D V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 20 | ZIELINSKI Isabella | D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 21 | DARINGA Arianna | V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 22 | PRIEUR Lauren | V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 22 | SHOMAN Miriam | D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 22 | TIBURCIO Diana | D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 25 | CHRISTEAS Artemis Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | BENOIT Adelaide | D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 27 | BAKER Amelia | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 28 | CHAN Leanne | V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 29 | MCSWEENEY Ky | V D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 30 | LARUSSO Avery Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | CHAUHAN Anushree Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | VAN DEN BOL Ashley | D D V V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 33 | OSBALDESTON Becca Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | JANAW Mila Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | HAMMAN Lucia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | SCHREMP Michele Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | LOPEZ Catherine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | WOOD Carter Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | BENITO Alex Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | IP Alyssa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | MARTINEZ Charlie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | HOAGLAND Simone | V D D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 43 | BLESSING Katherine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | CHEN Jia | D D D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 45 | RANKA Avani Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | TONG Kunling | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
| 47 | BONE Emily Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | TOWNLEY-BAKEWELL Felix Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | HIX Harlee Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | KUPCHA McKenna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | AKULOVA Kat | D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 52 | RUPP Zoe | D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 53 | PELLETIER Skylar | D D D D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 | |
| 54 | LUNDQUIST Nerissa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | CHAN Lilly | D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
| 56 | MARTINEZ Jenna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | EDELMAN Madison Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | NUTHI Kavya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | MOSHER Kai Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | MAHURKAR Kiran Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | MEDINA Sophia | D D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.