Student Recreation Center @ Texas State University - San Marcos, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KRAMER Jack P. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | LUEBBE Jost | V V V V | V V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 3 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | V V V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 3 | MCALISTER Ian | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | WRIGHT Ryan K. | V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 6 | BARRERA Esperanza | V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 7 | FEINGERSCH Ariav (Ari) B. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | REINISCH Michael A. | V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 9 | YOUNG Vivian | V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 10 | HAWLEY Justin | V V D V V | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 11 | BEAHAN Kevin K. | V V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | VAN VACTER Madelynn | V D V D V | V V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 13 | LANTRIP Dean | V V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | EMMERT Jp | D V V D | V V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 15 | VASYAKIN Liana | V D D D | V V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 16 | HERNDON Liam | D D D V D | V V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 17 | SALEH Omar | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 18 | TAYLOR Liam F. | V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | HENTOSH Pierce | D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 20 | ABBONDANZIO David R. | V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 21 | FRANZESE Nicholas P. | V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | CORTES Jose | V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | WOODALL Ian L. | D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | BIGGS Jacob | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 26 | RAGSDALE Jarrod | V V D D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 27 | OBREBSKI Kevin | V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | SOOS Whitman | V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | SCEROLER Anslee | D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 30 | NG Dylan | D D V D V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 31 | RAO Neil | D V D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 32 | LE Nathan | D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | BARTON Christian | D V V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 34 | VAN VACTER Thomas | V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | HUDSON Ryan | V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 36 | HUANG Selina | D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 37 | TIEMANN Aidan | D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 38 | THOMA Jackson | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 39 | COLARES BADKE TOCCHETTO Lucca | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | MANGAN Hunter | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 40 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 42 | KASKAN Peter E. | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 43 | TAPSCOTT Nicolas | D D V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 | |
| 44 | GRIMSHAW Tim | D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 46 | NGUYEN Bao | D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 47 | JAMES thomas | D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 48 | HWANG Joseph | D V D D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 49 | SMITH Samuel J. | D V D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 51 | TULLY Gage | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 52 | OLSON Joseph | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 53 | SON Kevin | D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 54 | LOFTEN Jahzarah | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 54 | LI Annie | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 56 | COLEY Austin | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 57 | O'BRIEN Izzie | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.