Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NG Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
2 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
3 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
3 | BALE ATMAN | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
5 | SARWAHI Viraat | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% | |
6 | CHAMBERS Miles | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
7 | SAYAR Luke | 4% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | |
8 | KENNEDY Tomás | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
9 | YOOK Isaac | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
10 | DEELY Hartigan | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | |
11 | KHANNA Adamantis | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
12 | MORGAN Abrahm H. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 13% |
13 | BARENBOYM Michael | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
14 | NAYAGAM Nishant | 7% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
15 | IVRON Daniel | 34% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
16 | LUCAS William | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
17 | DE SIENA Salvatore | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
18 | ONUGHA II Emeka | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
19 | LIN Brendan | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
20 | GAO Kai | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
21 | BAI Evan | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
22 | TRZEPLA Max | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
23 | SONG Aidan | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
24 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
25 | SADHU Neiyam | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
26 | KETT Richard | 1% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
27 | TONG Kyle | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
28 | LOSQUADRO Joseph | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
29 | PORTER Dupree | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
30 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
31 | LIU Ryan | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
32 | GOMEZ Emilio | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | MACWILLIAMS Nicholas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% | |
34 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | LAU Kyrus | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
36 | CHANG Timothy | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
37 | BENNETT Lachlan | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
38 | REILLY Xavier | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | MIAO Heqi | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
40 | ZWAKA Jonas | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | FOUX Jonathan | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | |
42 | PAI Ayan | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
42 | KURIYAMA Marcus | 2% | 17% | 45% | 31% | 4% | - | |
44 | FIROOZI Sam | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | CHEN Vince | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.