Liacouras Center - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 1 | LOUIE Bryce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 3 | YU Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 51% | |||
| 3 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | ||
| 5 | SHAFAIE Kaveh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 6 | WU Nick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |||
| 7 | HU Oliver W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 66% | 18% | ||
| 8 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% | ||
| 9 | WONG Adam L.T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
| 10 | LORENZONI Davide | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |||
| 11 | DICKSON Farr R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 59% | ||||
| 12 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 9% | |||
| 13 | PYO Michael M. | 100% | 100% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |||
| 14 | ZHENG Alan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 8% | ||
| 15 | HO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 39% | 5% | |
| 16 | SINGH Dayaal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | ||
| 17 | TIERNEY David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 12% | ||
| 18 | MARTINEZ Donavyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
| 19 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 26% | 4% | ||
| 21 | HU Robin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 5% | - | ||
| 22 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 98% | 74% | 6% | - | ||||
| 23 | YANG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 76% | 28% | ||
| 24 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | ||
| 25 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 100% | 99% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |||
| 26 | GLOVER James | 100% | 91% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | |||
| 27 | NAGER Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 3% | ||
| 28 | GROSSMAN-SMISEK Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 17% | 1% | ||
| 29 | YIM Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 31 | SLEDESKI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 29% | 2% |
| 32 | XU Andrew | 100% | 97% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - | ||
| 33 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 55% | 7% | - | - | - | |||
| 34 | HECHT Joel | 100% | 72% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | ||
| 35 | OROZCO Francis | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - | ||
| 36 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 100% | 99% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | CHOWDHURY Arman | 100% | 87% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - | |
| 38 | LIAO Anthony J. | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - | ||
| 39 | BOOTSMA Shane | 100% | 97% | 69% | 22% | 2% | - | - | ||
| 40 | LANCASTER Rose | 100% | 50% | 5% | - | - | - | - | ||
| 41 | MARRAN Erik R. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | ESTEBAN Ruperto | 100% | 85% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 45 | THOMAS Liam | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | VILLANUEVA Daniel | 100% | 72% | 24% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 47 | VISHNEVSKY Aden | 100% | 64% | 11% | - | - | - | - | ||
| 47 | MONTOYA Fernando | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - | ||
| 51 | BACHMAN Mitchell | 100% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | HUANG Brian | 100% | 13% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 55 | CHEN Boris | 100% | 98% | 36% | ||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.