Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | |
2 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
3 | HSU Leah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 11% | |
3 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
5 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
5 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 34% |
7 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
8 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
9 | HAN Emma | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
10 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
11 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
12 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
13 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
14 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
15 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% |
16 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
17 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
18 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 9% | |
19 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
20 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
21 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
22 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 27% |
23 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
24 | MERMEGAS Olivia | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
26 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
27 | KWON Ava | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
28 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
29 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
30 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
31 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
32 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
33 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
34 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 11% |
35 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
36 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Adelayde | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
37 | KANG Ellie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
38 | NADKARNI Marisa | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
39 | WANG Callie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% |
40 | KIM Karen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
41 | GAY Sasha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
42 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
43 | DHAR Rana | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
44 | LIU Hannah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
45 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 12% |
45 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
47 | HUANG Doris | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
48 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
49 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
50 | STONE Coral | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
51 | LEI Zitong (Meya) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
52 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 11% | |
53 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
54 | LONG Jessie | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
55 | SINGER Ellery | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
56 | CHOI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
56 | AWAD Royce | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
58 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | - |
59 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | YUEN Nicole | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
61 | HO Sophia | 100% | 86% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
62 | ZHAI AMY | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
63 | YU Stella | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
64 | GONG Joy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
65 | MAK Kaitlin | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | |
66 | BLAKE Anna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
67 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
68 | CONG Anne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 6% |
69 | SUNG Isabella | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
70 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
71 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
72 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
73 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
74 | MEYERSON Michelle | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
75 | MOON Claire | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
77 | YE Madeleine | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
78 | KIM Satie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
79 | CHERON Helene | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
80 | KIM Saeren | 100% | 87% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
81 | TISSONE Veronica | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
82 | JIANG Evelyn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
83 | KU Alathea-Joy | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
84 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
85 | ZHU Avril | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
86 | KIM Grace M. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
87 | HUANG Neila | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
88 | LAI Karen | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
89 | KIRBY Skye | 100% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
90 | WANG JiaQi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
91 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
92 | TONG Laurie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
93 | STAPLEY Claire | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
94 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
95 | SUNG Olivia | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
96 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
97 | LIN Annika | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
98 | CAI Veronica | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
99 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
100 | TIAN Cynthia | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
101 | ASPIRAS Avery | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
102 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
103 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
104 | LI Sonia | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
105 | LEE Alyson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
106 | SEBASTIAN Ava | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
107 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
108 | VATS Ishita | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
109 | SHEN Emily | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
110 | BAERENWALD Welles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
111 | ZHANG Olivia | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
112 | PADHI Kaavya | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
113 | JUILLERAT Elina | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
114 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
115 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 88% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | |
115 | REN Katherine | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
117 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
118 | KESSLER Amelia | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
119 | CLAIANU Adriana | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | |
120 | SYED Azra | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
120 | YU Skylar | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
122 | CHERUKURI Tanvi | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
122 | LEIGH Adalene | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
122 | KIM Alice | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
122 | JUNG Sienna | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
126 | KO Ariel | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
127 | AKULOVA Eva | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.