NKFA Salle - Ludlow, KY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
2 | EDWARDS Tim | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
3 | WRIGHT Dylan E. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 46% | 14% |
3 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
5 | DUNKLIN Cameron | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
6 | CROSS Ryan | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
7 | REEN Stephen | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
8 | MILLER Zach | 2% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
9 | LEWTON Grace | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
10 | CHANEY Devin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
11 | STOKER Brady | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
12 | WHITMAN Abigail | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
13 | STAUBITZ Marc | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
14 | PIERCE Marcia M. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
15 | HUCULAK Eerik | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
16 | ROGERS Reeves | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | RIEMAN Tristan | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
18 | BABBITT Phoenix | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
19 | YORKE Evan | 1% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
20 | STOREY III Leo M. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
21 | BRETHAUER Adah | 18% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
22 | FRANK William N. | - | 4% | 28% | 58% | 8% | - | - |
23 | SKAGGS Jacob | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
24 | KENNEDY Sam | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
25 | PLANAS Ethan | 41% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
26 | DUTTON Kitty | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
27 | WICKS Landon | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.