Nazlymov Fencing - Washington, DC, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JOHNSON Langston C. | V D V V V | V V | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 2 | JOHNSON Lauren | D V V D V D | V V | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 3 | FENKER Will M. | V V V V V | V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | LEE Justin | V V D V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 5 | JIANG Kevin | D V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 6 | NI Sharon | D V V V D | V V | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 7 | OLSEN Natalie J. | D V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 8 | REN Richard | V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 9 | STONE Christopher A. | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 10 | FENG Leo | D D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 11 | BAKER Keith L. | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | TIERNO Thomas J. | D V D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 13 | HU Allison C. | V V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 14 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | V D V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 15 | YEE Evan J. | V V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 16 | JOHNSON Lydia | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 17 | ELDER John | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 18 | ROZENTAL Robert | D D V D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 19 | NEWMAN Jack | D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 20 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.