University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LOVERA Gaëtan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | SIDES Nathaniel S. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | GOODSON Caleb (Caleb Goodson) B. | V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 3 | WEBB Jacob T. | V V V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 5 | MITCHELL Christopher | V D V V | V V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 6 | DUNLAP Ian | V V D V | V V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 7 | WYSE Cameron | V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 8 | WANG Maxwell L. | V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | MITCHELL Henry | V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 10 | RYAN Sean | V D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 11 | BEDWORTH Paige | V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | YANG Ethan J. | V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 13 | SEATON Jake | D V V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | MYERS Cooper | V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | REYNOLDS Jay | V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | STUESSY Nolan | D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 17 | BRAINERD Jim | V V D V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 18 | BURT Stephen | V D V V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 19 | PARISH Levi | V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 20 | BLACK Elias | D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 21 | SENSENICH William | V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 22 | KENNEDY Benjamin | D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 23 | TSCHOLL Dario | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 24 | LEACH Lauren | D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | DEE Micah | D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 26 | WILSON Graham | V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 27 | DERRINGER Derrick | D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 28 | MARKERT Meghan | D V D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 29 | MOHAMMED Sadiq | D V D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 30 | KMETT Clementine | D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | MOORE Cole | D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 32 | BURNUM Thomas | D D D D | V D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 33 | DAVIS Rowan | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | VON KLAR Rhiannon | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 36 | NOELL Eliza | D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 36 | CULP Claire | D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.