Event Results
Emory's 2nd Annual Fall Dooley DuelDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Daniel | V V V | V V | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 2 | SHAFRITZ Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | TUCKER Evan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | KULIKOWSKI Adam | V V | V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 5 | PABON James | V V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 6 | RAVITA Henry | V | V | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 7 | HUA Daniel | D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 8 | BERNSTEIN Leo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | BILLARD Julien Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | MOSS Riley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | SONG Vivian | V D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 | |
| 12 | BAIK Sean | D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 13 | DOUGLAS John | D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 14 | MALLOY Pierce Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | JARMAN Robert | D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |