University of Tennessee HPER Building - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ODBADRAKH Batu | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 33% |
2 | SMITH ` Tyler M. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
3 | HAUSER Samuel | - | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
3 | MOHAMMED Sadiq | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% |
5 | BOWMAN Tamara E. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
6 | STEWART Brian | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
7 | HARKONEN Eemil | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 27% | 3% |
8 | NGUYEN Albert | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
9 | DERRINGER Derrick | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
10 | WAHL Nathan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
11 | GURKIN Justin | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
12 | CROSS Phoenix | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
13 | HUMPHREY Asher | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
14 | SAMMONS Emily | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.