Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 1% | 19% | 60% | 19% |
| 2 | CHENG Ava | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 3 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 3 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 5 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | 2% | 30% | 68% |
| 6 | BLIN Margaux J. | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
| 7 | LEE Yedda | - | 4% | 26% | 54% | 15% | 1% |
| 8 | FLO Sena | 10% | 50% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% |
| 11 | KIM Angelina | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 12 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | LU Samantha R. | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% |
| 14 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 15 | LONG Madeline M. | 20% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 16 | HU Chelsea | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MACEDON Gianna | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 18 | LIU Nicole | 21% | 47% | 29% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.