Duel at Dallas Div1A/2/Vet ROC

Div I-A Men's Saber

Saturday, November 18, 2023 at 11:00 AM

Fencing Institute of Texas, Inc. - Carrollton, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 CRAIG Samuel 100% 100% 99% 86% 43%
2 GUFFEY Christopher 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 73%
3 ROE Finnegan 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 66%
3 GONZALEZ Jake 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 9%
5 SALMAN Hamzah 100% 99% 84% 42% 7% < 1%
6 BOSITA Carson 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 47%
7 KO Zuriel 100% 99% 92% 66% 27% 5%
8 KITSON Chase 100% 100% 94% 71% 33% 6%
9 ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 61%
10 VEDRE Neil 100% 99% 89% 56% 18% 2%
11 WILKINSON James 100% 98% 71% 21% 2%
12 HERRERA aragon 100% 100% 94% 69% 24% 3%
13 KWON Kenneth 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 2%
14 LIN Lucas 100% 97% 72% 30% 6% -
15 HUANG Zekai 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 14%
16 OBEID Zaky 100% 64% 21% 3% - -
17 ZLATINSKI Jason 100% 99% 90% 62% 23% 2%
18 BOLLU Viren 100% 91% 59% 21% 3% -
19 RAMSEY Alexander 100% 90% 56% 20% 4% -
20 POLISETTI Pranav 100% 17% 1% - -
21 NAMBIAR Navin 100% 90% 58% 20% 3% -
22 KU Collin 100% 44% 8% 1% - -
22 BROCKMEYER Tyler 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 18%
24 HOU Yifan 100% 88% 53% 18% 3% -
25 KIM Paul 100% 93% 63% 24% 3% -
26 KOTVALI Aneesh 100% 97% 76% 33% 5% -
27 WILSON Matthew D. 100% 98% 78% 40% 10% 1%
28 SEETHAMRAJU Pranay 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% -
29 LO Bradley 100% 100% 97% 72% 20%
30 ZHU Shirui 100% 99% 92% 67% 28% 5%
31 REILLEY Brogan 100% 35% 5% - - -
32 DANIELL Steven J. 100% 92% 63% 25% 5% -
33 MAI Weiquan 100% 97% 58% 16% 1%
34 YU Xu 100% 92% 54% 14% 1% -
35 VYAKARANAM ISHANTH 100% 96% 74% 35% 8% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.