Jump Beyond Sports - Torrance, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
2 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 49% | 34% |
3 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
3 | YAO Abby | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 3% |
5 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | - | - | 15% | 85% | |
6 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
7 | POEI Lauren | - | - | 4% | 29% | 59% | 7% | |
8 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 4% |
9 | LENK Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 49% |
10 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | |
11 | WYNN Kylie | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 41% |
12 | YONG Rosalind | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 51% | 7% |
13 | PEDERSEN Haley | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
14 | OH Ceana | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
15 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | - | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 2% | |
16 | ZOU Ella | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
17 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
18 | LI Joy | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
19 | KIM Sydney | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | ||
20 | LIU Samantha | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
21 | RUI Jessie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
22 | ZEE Savannah | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 11% | - |
23 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 37% | 8% | |
24 | ZONG Melody | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
25 | DESAI Esha | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
26 | LIM Kensie | - | 6% | 32% | 49% | 14% | - | |
27 | LI Alice | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 9% |
28 | SAH Madeleine | 3% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 4% | ||
29 | HUGHES Olivia | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - |
30 | TAN Shouyin | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
31 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | HSIAO Ariya | 14% | 50% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | ZOU JIAYING | 2% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
34 | SOE Hayleigh | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
35 | LIU Ashley | 2% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 4% | ||
36 | PARK Lauren | - | 11% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | HAN Gian | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 39% | 7% | |
38 | VILLARAMA Kara | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
39 | ANDONIAN Lauren | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
40 | CHOI Sophie | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
41 | CHEN Madeleine | 6% | 34% | 42% | 17% | 1% | ||
42 | LEE Zoe | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
43 | ZHAO Olivia | 2% | 22% | 48% | 25% | 3% | - | |
44 | CHANG Olivia | 4% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
45 | LUCAS Ava | 14% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
46 | DENG Claire | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
47 | NEUMANN Erika | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
48 | LIU Ariana | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
49 | XIA Isabella | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
50 | YU Sophie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
51 | HSU Rachel | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 21% | 3% | - |
52 | LIN Allison | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
52 | FANG Kelervia | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
54 | CHUN Ami | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
55 | LU Alexis | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
56 | MA Yifei (Olivia) | 28% | 45% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
57 | WANG Yanxuan(Alicia) | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
57 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
59 | KIM Natalie | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
60 | TAI Taphanie | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
61 | ZHANG Queeny | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
62 | COLIC LANI | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | ||
63 | IDANAWANG Madison | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
64 | IDANAWANG Allison | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
65 | LEE LAUREN | 48% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | HART Christie | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
67 | YU Xintong | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
68 | YANG Byanca | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
69 | CHEN Chelsea | 18% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
70 | YANG Callie | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.