Fencing Institute of Texas, Inc. - Carrollton, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BOSITA Carson | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | HERRERA aragon | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | ROE Finnegan | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 3 | KITSON Chase | V D V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | GONZALEZ Jake | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | KWON Kenneth | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 6 | ZLATINSKI Jason | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 8 | SALMAN Hamzah | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | BROCKMEYER Tyler | V V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 10 | BOLLU Viren | V V V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 11 | HUANG Zekai | V V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | KO Zuriel | D V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 13 | WILKINSON James | D V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 14 | ZHU Shirui | D V V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | LO Bradley | V V V D V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 16 | VEDRE Neil | D D V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 17 | NAMBIAR Navin | V D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | LIN Lucas | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 19 | RAMSEY Alexander | D V V V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 20 | KOTVALI Aneesh | V D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 20 | ROSS Joe | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 22 | OBEID Zaky | D D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 23 | POLISETTI Pranav | V D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 24 | HOU Yifan | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | RIDEOUT aiden | D V V D D D | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 26 | TALLEY Blake | D V D D D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
| 27 | KIM Paul | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 28 | SEETHAMRAJU Pranay | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 29 | JOHNSON Waldron | D D D V D D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 30 | YU Xu | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 31 | WILSON Matthew D. | D D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 32 | REILLEY Brogan | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | NARVENKAR Neil | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 34 | MAI Weiquan | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 35 | SMITH Samuel J. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.